Climate Village sustainability and institutional support: A systematic review
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study presents a systematic literature review (SLR) of climate village programs, with particular attention to institutional support, community participation, and sustainability practices. Guided by the PRISMA protocol, 42 eligible articles were analyzed to map the geographical scope, journal quality, theoretical frameworks, governance arrangements, and the role of local resources. The review reveals significant heterogeneity across contexts: African studies emphasize renewable energy, Bangladesh highlights adaptation politics, Indonesia adopts a multi-sectoral approach, while small island states prioritize coastal conservation. Most studies employ qualitative and participatory methods, drawing on resilience theory, socio-ecological systems, participatory governance, and energy transition perspectives. Institutional support is found to operate through multi-level governance involving government, NGOs, communities, and private actors. However, power asymmetries often constrain long-term sustainability. Local resources and indigenous knowledge emerge as critical for resilience but require supportive legal and institutional frameworks to avoid elite capture and ensure genuine empowerment. Theoretically, this review advances the concept of Climate Villages as socio-ecological laboratories linking global climate agendas with local action. Practically, it identifies the need for contextualized interventions, stronger governance coordination, and knowledge co-production. The findings provide actionable insights for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers seeking to strengthen the design, implementation, and sustainability of Climate Village initiatives.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Aditya, R. (2019). Analisis penta helix dalam melihat keberlanjutan program CSR Patratura Tahun 2017 di PT Pertamina RU III Plaju. EMPOWER: Jurnal Pengembangan Masyarakat Islam, 4(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.24235/empower.v4i2.5320
Aggarwal, P. K., Jarvis, A., Campbell, B. M., Zougmoré, R. B., Khatri-Chhetri, A., Vermeulen, S. J., Loboguerrero, A. M., Sebastian, L. S., Kinyangi, J., Bonilla-Findji, O., Radeny, M., Recha, J., Martinez-Baron, D., Ramirez-Villegas, J., Huyer, S., Thornton, P., Wollenberg, E., Hansen, J., Alvarez-Toro, P., Aguilar-Ariza, A., Arango-Londoño, D., Patiño-Bravo, V., Rivera, O., Ouedraogo, M., & Yen, B. T. (2018). The climate-smart village approach: framework of an integrative strategy for scaling up adaptation options in agriculture. Ecology and Society, 23(1), 14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26799070
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Anugrah, N. (2022). Siaran pers Nomor: SP. 108/HUMAS/PPIP/HMS.3/03/2022. Ministry of Environment and Forestry. http://ppid.menlhk.go.id/berita/siaran-pers/6490/
Arifeen, A., & Nyborg, I. (2021). How humanitarian assistance practices exacerbate vulnerability: Knowledges, authority and legitimacy in disaster interventions in Baltistan, Pakistan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 54, 102027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.102027
Ariyaningsih, & Shaw, R. (2023). Community-based approach for climate resilience and Covid-19: case study of a climate village (Kampung Iklim) in Balikpapan, Indonesia. Land, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/land12030650
Armitage, D., de Loë, R. C., Morris, M., Edwards, T. W. D., Gerlak, A. K., Hall, R. I., Huitema, D., Ison, R., Livingstone, D., MacDonald, G., Mirumachi, N., Plummer, R., & Wolfe, B. B. (2015). Science–policy processes for transboundary water governance. Ambio, 44(5), 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0644-x
Bian, Q., Han, Z., Veuthey, J., & Ma, B. (2021). Risk perceptions of nuclear energy, climate change, and earthquake: How are they correlated and differentiated by ideologies? Climate Risk Management, 32, 100297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2021.100297
Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). Scientometrics in a changing research landscape. EMBO Reports, 15(12), 1228–1232. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201439608
Borras, S. M., Franco, J. C., & Nam, Z. (2020). Climate change and land: Insights from Myanmar. World Development, 129, 104864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104864
Brown, H. C. P., & Sonwa, D. J. (2018). Diversity within village institutions and its implication for resilience in the context of climate change in Cameroon. Climate and Development, 10(5), 448–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2017.1291409
Budiningsih, K., Malik Setiabudi, I., Yosefi Suryandari, E., Djaenudin, D., & Iqbal, M. (2020). Criteria and indicators for village preparedness levels in controlling forest and land fires. Journal of Forestry Policy Analysis, 17(2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2020.17.2.123-139
Cooke, A., Smith, D., & Booth, A. (2012). Beyond PICO: The SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 22(10), 1435–1443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312452938
Fatkhullah, M., Pamungkas, N. R., Habib, M. A. F., & Mulyani, I. (2023). Reducing greenhouse gas emissions through community-based action: An analysis of the Program Kampung Iklim in Indonesia. ASEAN Social Work Journal, 11(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.58671/aswj.v11i1.33
Folke, C., Biggs, R., Norström, A. V., Reyers, B., & Rockström, J. (2016). Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecology and Society, 21(3), 41. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08748-210341
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
Ghimire, R., Khatri-Chhetri, A., & Chhetri, N. (2022). Institutional innovations for climate smart agriculture: assessment of climate-smart village approach in Nepal. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6, 734319. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.734319
Gupta, D., Lele, S., & Sahu, G. (2020). Promoting a responsive state: The role of NGOs in decentralized forest governance in India. Forest Policy and Economics, 111, 102066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102066
Henriksen, L. F., Kamnde, K., Silvano, P., Olwig, M. F., Mwamfupe, A., & Gallemore, C. (2023). Strong collaborative governance networks support effective forest stewardship council-certified community-based forest management: Evidence from Southeast Tanzania. Global Environmental Change, 82, 102734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102734
Herdiansyah, H. (2021). Climate village program for climate change adaptation and mitigation for green villages. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 819(1), 012034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/819/1/012034
Ismiartha, G. R., Santoso, R. S., & Hanani, R. (2019). Analisis stakeholders dalam kegiatan pengelolaan sampah Program Kampung Iklim (Proklim) sebagai upaya mitigasi perubahan iklim Dusun Soka, Desa Lerep, Kecamatan Ungaran Barat, Kabupaten Semarang. Journal Of Public Policy and Management Review, 10(12), 86-103. https://doi.org/10.14710/jppmr.v10i2.30591
Mandra, M. A. S., Amir, F., & Mithen. (2024). Strategic integration of climate change adaptation and mitigation to support Climate Village Program in rural Indonesia. Disaster Advances, 18(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.25303/181da046050
Massarella, K., Sallu, S. M., Ensor, J. E., & Marchant, R. (2018). REDD+, hype, hope and disappointment: The dynamics of expectations in conservation and development pilot projects. World Development, 109, 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.006
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56
Mulyasari, F., Harahap, A. K., Rio, A. O., Sule, R., & Kadir, W. G. A. (2021b). Potentials of the public engagement strategy for public acceptance and social license to operate: Case study of Carbon Capture, Utilisation, and Storage Gundih Pilot Project in Indonesia. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 108, 103312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103312
Nightingale, A. J. (2017). Power and politics in climate change adaptation efforts: Struggles over authority and recognition in the context of political instability. Geoforum, 84, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.05.011
Nigussie, Z., Tsunekawa, A., Haregeweyn, N., Adgo, E., Cochrane, L., Floquet, A., & Abele, S. (2018). Applying Ostrom’s institutional analysis and development framework to soil and water conservation activities in North-Western Ethiopia. Land Use Policy, 71, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.039
Ning, F., Wang, H., Chien, Y.-C., Pan, H., & Ou, S.-J. (2023). A study on the spatial and temporal dynamics of landscape spatial patterns of different types of rural communities in Taiwan. Ecological Indicators, 157, 111227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111227
Nopriyasman, N., Asnan, G., Fauzi, A., Hastuti, I. P., Ritonga, A. H., Kurniawan, V., & Mairiska, R. (2024). Reading indigenous signs: The wisdom of nagari communities toward natural disaster in Pasaman Barat. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 107, 104497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104497
Nordberg, K., Mariussen, Å., & Virkkala, S. (2020). Community-driven social innovation and quadruple helix coordination in rural development. Case study on LEADER group Aktion Österbotten. Journal of Rural Studies, 79, 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.001
Normaleni, E., Kumalawati, R., Kartika, N. Y., Nugroho, A. R., Riadi, S., & Efendi, M. (2020). Program Kampung Iklim (Tinjauan Persepsi Masyarakat Kota Banjarmasin) (Nasrudin, Shararuddin, & E. R. Normasary, Eds.; 1st ed.). Lambung Mangkurat University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2008). Tragedy of the Commons. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2047-1
Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L.A., Stewart, L.A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A.C., Welch, V.A., Whiting, P., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Purwanto, W., Faridl Widhagdha, M., Ajar, S. B., & Hidayat, R. (2022). Sustainable corporate social responsibility program as an effort for community adaptation to climate change, case study in Bukit Batu District, Bengkalis Regency. Proceeding 2nd International Conference on Communication Science, 2(1), 539-545. https://doi.org/10.29303/iccsproceeding.v2i1.117
Purwantoro, A., Haryanto, T., & Nurhidayati, S. E. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of Climate Village Program in Scopus database by Indonesian author. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 1102–1110. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5581
Putraditama, A., Kim, Y.-S., & Baral, H. (2021). Where to put community-based forestry? Reconciling conservation and livelihood in Lampung, Indonesia. Trees, Forests and People, 4, 100062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100062
Rahman, M. M., Kabir, M. E., Jahir Uddin Akon, A. S. M., & Ando, K. (2015). High carbon stocks in roadside plantations under participatory management in Bangladesh. Global Ecology and Conservation, 3, 412–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2015.01.011
Resosudarmo, I. A. P., Tacconi, L., Sloan, S., Hamdani, F. A. U., Subarudi, Alviya, I., & Muttaqin, M. Z. (2019). Indonesia’s land reform: Implications for local livelihoods and climate change. Forest Policy and Economics, 108, 101903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.04.007
Rusdi, J. F., Baktina, T. G., Hadiningrat, R. G., Sunaryo, B., Fannya, P., & Laurenty, F. (2020). Research collaboration in the era of technology and communication. BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi Dan Informasi, 41(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.14203/j.baca.v41i1.585
Sanders, A. J. P., Ford, R. M., Keenan, R. J., & Larson, A. M. (2020). Learning through practice? Learning from the REDD+ demonstration project, Kalimantan Forests and Climate Partnership (KFCP) in Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104285
Sikor, T., He, J., & Lestrelin, G. (2017). Property rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis revisited. World Development, 93, 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.032
Sovacool, B. K. (2018). Bamboo beating bandits: Conflict, inequality, and vulnerability in the political ecology of climate change adaptation in Bangladesh. World Development, 102, 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.10.014
Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
Surachman, Afiah, E. T., & Permata, N. (2023). PKM Kampung Iklim (PROKLIM) di Kampung Pekijing Kelurahan Kalang Anyar Kota Serang_Banten. Indonesian Journal of Engagement, Community Services, Empowerment and Development, 3(2), 156-169. https://doi.org/10.53067/ijecsed.v3i2.108
Trotter, P. A., & Brophy, A. (2022). Policy mixes for business model innovation: The case of off-grid energy for sustainable development in sub-Saharan Africa. Research Policy, 51(6), 104528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104528
Wiati, C. B., Dharmawan, I. W. S., Sakuntaladewi, N., Ekawati, S., Wahyuni, T., Maharani, R., Hadiyan, Y., Naibaho, Y., Satria, W. I., Ngatiman, N., Abdurachman, A., Karmilasanti, K., Laksmita, A. N., Angi, E. M., & Khadka, C. (2022b). Challenges to and strategies for the climate village program plus: A lesson learned from Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(9), 5530. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095530
Yunas, N. S. (2019). Implementasi Konsep Penta Helix dalam Pengembangan Potensi Desa melalui Model Lumbung Ekonomi Desa di Provinsi Jawa Timur. Matra Pembaruan: Jurnal Inovasi Kebijakan, 3(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.3.1.2019.37-46